Foundations are expensive. Why? They're the most important part of any house. I've designed these houses to sit on steel columns for a couple of reasons, which I'll outline below.
The first, and most important consideration was termites. Yes, there are termites here in Oxley. They're everywhere, and they can't be eradicated from the environment unless you could treat the whole street, and the whole suburb, and the whole of south-east Queensland, and even then they'd probably have made their way back in a couple of months. That's just what they do.
Termites are the cancer of the house world. In slab-on-ground construction they are difficult to prevent. They only need the smallest of entry points and they are in. Column construction does not require the use of chemical barriers (if you have concerns about chemicals in the home environment then this might be an issue for you, particularly if you have young children), or rely on the integrity of barrier systems. Also, the owner is not required to pay the ongoing 6-12 monthly inspection fees to maintain the warranty of termite prevention systems. However you do need to check with your insurance company on their requirements to maintain insurance coverage. As not all termite species require a connection to the ground,.. and there are other insects such as borers that can attack timber. (Treated frame timbers are a must in my opinion.)
Another important consideration I made when choosing to go with steel columns was the ground conditions. The engineer in their design process conducted a soil report, and for both sites this came back as 'H', which means the ground is highly reactive to moisture changes. So, if the houses were to be slab-on-ground, the design would have to try and resist these ground forces. That's a fancy way of saying that the soil around here is in fact solid clay, which has a bad habit of moving about and shifting your house. Ground movement causing unsightly cracking in brick construction is a huge problem within the industry.
Here I have used adjustable tops on the columns. This means that should the worst happen and the house does move, these adjustable tops can be raised or lowered (using a really really big spanner) to return the house to level. To be honest, I don’t expect this to happen as I always take particular care with the foundation material... really they are there as insurance. This is the first time I have used adjustable tops, the main reason being that I hope these houses to have a very low ongoing cost to the owner in the long term. So, this means planning for the worst case scenario.
For 25 Chapman Place, the holes averaged between 2.5 and 3 metres deep. I ensured all holes were drilled through the highly reactive clay, and into a consistent fine material as shown.
Additionally as the holes were so deep, I had to use a vacuum truck to clean the holes of all debris. The drilling process of the hole by an excavator does not remove all loose material, because as the auger is removed soil falls back in the hole. It’s common practise in the industry not to remove this, but rather tamp down loose material in the bottom of the hole, which can result in your house sitting on 100-200 mm of disturbed material. Why don’t all builders clean the holes properly? 'Time equals money' is the simple answer, as it’s a time consuming process and not a very nice job to do. On this job the cost of the vacuum truck alone was close to $2000.
 |
| A typical hole on this site, nice and clean! You can see where the auger has scraped up the side, which shows that it goes down down down through the clay, until suddenly towards the bottom (that's at least 2.5 meters deep down there - tricky to photograph!) it changes to a decomposed rocky sub-soil as shown in the earlier photograph. |
 |
| Here, at the bottom of this hole, you can see the drill auger centre hole. This is what a hole should look like if it's been cleaned out properly - you can see the mark of the auger in that patch of sunlight at the very bottom of the hole. No debris! |
Flexibility is also another feature of steel column construction. Should the buyer want to add power or data points (something to consider is this age of rapidly changing technology), change the kitchen or bathroom, all services are easily accessible. This saves the home owner money in the long term. Also issues like blocked drains are simple to fix as all is easily accessible. The possibility of raising the house sometime in the future is also a viable option with steel column construction.
Another advantage of putting the house up on columns is that the underlying ground has not had to be either cut into or built up. The natural ground levels have been preserved. This means that potential problems with pooling water or unnatural run-off for either these or neighbouring properties are largely avoided. It's an environmentally-sound thing to do, to work with the ground you've got rather than shaping a piece of sloping land into a piece of flat land: no excavators, no digging, no retaining walls, no fill. Building on columns is not necessarily the cheapest thing to do - which is why slab-on-ground construction is most common for entry-level housing.
 |
| The initial site preparation for 25 Chapman Place. No cutting in, no building up. |